Warning: include_once() [function.include-once]: open_basedir restriction in effect. File(/home/kaylward/public_html/poll/poll_cookie.php) is not within the allowed path(s): (/home/awards:/usr/lib/php:/usr/local/lib/php:/tmp) in /home/awards/public_html/2004/archives/003827.php on line 4

Warning: include_once(/home/kaylward/public_html/poll/poll_cookie.php) [function.include-once]: failed to open stream: Operation not permitted in /home/awards/public_html/2004/archives/003827.php on line 4

Warning: include_once() [function.include]: Failed opening '/home/kaylward/public_html/poll/poll_cookie.php' for inclusion (include_path='.:/usr/lib/php:/usr/local/lib/php') in /home/awards/public_html/2004/archives/003827.php on line 4
2004 Weblog Awards: Welcome To The 2004 Weblog Awards

September 28, 2004

Welcome To The 2004 Weblog Awards

Last year Wizbang hosted the extremely successful 2003 Weblog Awards. This year the 2004 version of the awards will be here on their own domain. You can bookmark The 2004 Weblog Awards now.

The 2004 Weblog Awards will continue the tradition begun here last year:

1) Open and public nominations
2) Categories that allow blogs of similar readership levels to compete
3) Real time vote totals
4) Quick turnaround of the results
5) Fun

Nominations will open Wednesday November 3, 2004. Many more details to follow.

Why were the 2003 Weblog Awards a success? I think they were successful because unlike nearly every other end of year award the 2003 Weblog Awards were as open and honest (except for a day of ballot stuffing - which was quickly fixed) as I could possibly make them. Nominations were public, and I did the best I could to get as many sites on the ballots in 20 different categories. Overall close to 400 blogs were in the running for awards. I even ran a Most Egregious Omission contest to prove that I wasn't trying to claim a mantle of infallibility.

Of course everything did not go perfectly... There was controversy about the inclusion of a Best Female Authored Blog (without a corresponding Male category); there were probably a few categories that should have been added; and there were a few categories that should have been removed. That said, most people took it for what it was - FUN, and did not get bent out of shape.

Posted by Kevin Aylward at September 28, 2004 09:22 PM | TrackBack
Comments

OK, so will there be a graphic for this, or do we just post a text link to allow someone to nominate us?

Posted by: The Smoke Eater at September 29, 2004 06:19 AM

I will add a graphic
This will be fun.
Patti

Posted by: Patti Patton-Bader at September 29, 2004 12:17 PM

Call me Santa: Making my list, checking it twice. There are lots of new blogs worthy of the attention this year, and it will be interesting to see your catagories. I'm hoping you will include a catagory for Newsworthiness (oft sited by MSN), or perhaps the convention bloggers.

Looking forward to it.

Posted by: Mamamontezz at September 29, 2004 01:20 PM

What about a category for best corporate product support weblog?

Posted by: Gary Petersen at September 29, 2004 01:44 PM

'Bout the only one I could even be competitive in would be if there was categories like the blog with the best Nightly Navel Gazin' Reports™ or somethin'.

Posted by: Tig at November 15, 2004 06:50 PM

It is dangerous to be sincere unless you are also stupid. George Bernard Shaw (1856 - 1950), Man and Superman (1903) "Maxims for Revolutionists"

Posted by: georgia payday loan at November 22, 2004 04:42 AM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?